International Gymnastics Federation admits errors to Dutch gymnast amidst Chiles controversy
The International Gymnastics Federation is in hot water again after a Dutch gymnast told Essentially Sports that FIG admitted to making a scoring mistake on her routine. This comes shortly after the swirling controversy surrounding USA gymnast Jordan Chiles and her bronze medal being taken away.
Lieke Wevers from Holland said, "My right foot, my heel was just over the line and the left one definitely not. So yeah, I was given a 0.3 instead of a 0.1, and if I didn't get that, then I would have made the all-around final," she told Essentially Sports.
Wevers said that FIG admitted the mistake. "I actually got the confirmation quite quickly that they were wrong." She said she heard from Donatella Sacchi at FIG to this end, who is a high-ranking official at the organization. "They were very sorry and they were very understanding."
Want to see more like this? Follow us here for daily sports news, profiles and analysis!
Wevers' account is the latest in a string of wishy-washy decisions from FIG. Hard-to-fathom details continue to come out regarding the situation that saw Jordan Chiles stripped of her bronze medal at the 2024 Paris Olympics, as well.
Much of Chiles' situation boils down to a score appeal that was or was not received in time. The International Gymnastics Federation doesn't even know who received the verbal score challenge levied by USA coach Cecile Landi, according to Inside Gymnastics.
Inside Gymnastics wonders how the governing bodies of gymnastics could have ruled that Landi's appeal on Chiles behalf was filed too late, if they don't even know who the appeal was filed to in the first place.
It's just the latest development in what has been a whirlwind of controversy and confusion. Jordan Chiles was one of the United States' star gymnasts at the Paris Olympics, but the Games left a bitter aftertaste after she was stripped of her bronze medal.
Chiles took to social media to summarize her feelings about the complicated situation. She wrote on Instagram, "I have no words. This decision feels unjust and comes as a significant blow, not just to me, but to everyone who has championed my journey."
According to USA Today, the Court of Arbitration for Sport has officially decided that it will not re-open the challenge raised by USA gymnastics, which contended that Jordan Chiles fared well enough to earn a bronze medal.
However, some new information has been revealed that may greatly alter the perception of the appeals process. The head of CAS' panel that ruled against Chiles has clear ties to Romania, as the New York Times and others have reported. The decision to rule against Chiles has awarded the bronze medal to Romanian gymnast Ana Barbosu.
Hamid G. Gharavi is an attorney in France, but lends his legal expertise to Romania with regard to a dispute the country has with the World Bank's International Centre For The Settlement of Investment Disputes. He has been providing counsel to Romania for at least a decade, according to the New York Times.
CAS told the New York Times that Gharavi did disclose his legal work on behalf of Romania, as he was required to do before joining CAS. CAS stated that there were no objections to Gharavi's involvement after said disclosure.
Despite the somewhat murky circumstances surrounding CAS' final ruling, USA Gymnastics is not going to walk away from the matter. They told USA Today, "We are deeply disappointed by the notification and will continue to pursue every possible avenue and appeal process, including to the Swiss Federal Tribunal, to ensure the just score, placement and medal award for Jordan."
Jordan Chiles has had to deal with the emotional roller coaster of missing out on a medal, then winning it, only to eventually be told that she has to return it. We’ll go through the hard to fathom sequence that Chiles and her fans have had to endure.
This all started shortly after Chiles finished her routine in the women’s floor exercise final. Initially, she was not slated to win anything in the event, as a score of 13.666 left her in fifth place.
Gymnastics teams have the right to challenge the score assigned to a performance in this event, and the United States exercised that right after Chiles’ score was posted. According to USA Today and others, head coach Cecile Landi would have had one minute to submit the injury to revisit the score.
The challenge was deemed to have been received in time, and the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), ended up increasing Chiles’ score, which put her in third place and in line for the bronze medal. The challenge was based on the notion that Chiles difficulty score was graded too low, according to People’s website.
Want to see more like this? Follow us here for daily sports news, profiles and analysis!
The CAS’ decision put Chiles’ score ahead of two Romanian gymnasts, which prompted action from the Romanian Olympic Committee to appeal the decision.
Remarkably, CAS switched their ruling back to the original score, placing Ana Barbosu in third and bumping Chiles back out of the medal picture.
USA gymnastics did not take the matter sitting down, and issued a statement to People magazine’s website. "We are devastated by the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s ruling regarding women’s floor exercise. The inquiry into the Difficulty Value of Jordan Chiles’ floor exercise routine was filed in good faith, and, we believed, in according with FIG rules to ensure accurate scoring."
The Romanian Gymnastics committee didn’t contend that Chiles wasn’t graded on a fair curve. Instead, their rebuttal reportedly centered around the notion that USA coach Cecile Landi did not submit the challenge within the one-minute window. The Romanian body believes the challenge came four seconds too late.
Chiles and Team USA gymnastics were stunned that the Romanian committee disputed the result on the basis on timing. After it seemed liked Chiles’ case was dead in the water, another development in the saga unfolded.
Want to see more like this? Follow us here for daily sports news, profiles and analysis!
According to USA Today, USA gymnastics allegedly has obtained footage proving that Landi submitted the inquiry ahead of the one minute cutoff. They’re saying that Landi actually challenged the score twice, at 47 seconds and again at 55 seconds, and that the video they have now proves this.
USA Gymnastics told USA Today, "The video footage provided was not available to USA Gymnastics prior to the tribunal’s decision and thus USAG did not have the opportunity to previously submit it."
As this dramatic back and forth has played out, Jordan Chiles has been following the ups and downs just as everyone else has. Before returning to social media to post her most recent statement about CAS' decision, she initially stated that she was taking a break from Instagram as the appeals process played out.
USA Gymnastics told People, "Throughout the appeal process, Jordan has been subject to consistent, utterly baseless and extremely hurtful attacks on social media. No athlete should be subject to such treatment. We condemn the attacks and those who engage, support, or instigate them."
Gina Chiles, Jordan’s mother, posted on social media to say, "The racist disgusting comments are still happening in 2024. I’m tired of people who say it no longer exists. My daughter is a highly decorated Olympian with the biggest heart and a level of sportsmanship that is unmatched."
For what it’s worth, Ana Barbosu, who stands to gain from Chiles misfortune in this matter, has had classy things to say about the situation. She wrote on social media "Sabrina (her Romanian teammate), Jordan, my thoughts are with you. I know what you are feeling, because I’ve been through the same. But I know you’ll come back stronger."
Want to see more like this? Follow us here for daily sports news, profiles and analysis!
Barbosu also took a shot at CAS and the IOC on social media. "This situation would not have existed if the persons in charge had respected the regulation. We athletes are not to be blamed, and the hate directed to us is painful."